Resources

Study Links Chronic Fatigue to Virus Class

Leonard A. Jason, a professor of psychology at DePaul University and a leading researcher on the syndrome, agreed. “This class of retroviruses is probably going to be an important piece of the puzzle,” he said.

Note: This article was originally published in 2010. When the journal Science published an attention-grabbing study last fall linking Chronic Fatigue Syndrome to a recently discovered retrovirus, many experts remained skeptical – especially after four other studies found no such association.

A second research team has reported a link between Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and the same class of virus, a category known as MLV-related viruses. In a paper published by The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, scientists found gene sequences from several MLV-related viruses in blood cells from 32 out of 37 chronic-fatigue patients but only 3 of 44 healthy ones.

The researchers did not find XMRV, the specific retrovirus identified in patients last fall. But by confirming the presence of a cluster of genetically similar viruses, the new study represents a significant advance, experts and advocates say.

“I think it settles the issue of whether the initial report was real or not,” said K. Kimberly McCleary, president of the CFIDS Association of America, the leading organization for people with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome.

Leonard A. Jason, a professor of psychology at DePaul University and a leading researcher on the syndrome, agreed. “This class of retroviruses is probably going to be an important piece of the puzzle,” he said.

Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, estimated to afflict at least one million Americans, has no known cause and no accepted diagnostic tests, although patients show signs of immunological, neurological and endocrinological abnormalities. Besides profound exhaustion, symptoms include sleep disorders, cognitive problems, muscle and joint pain, sore throat and headaches.

The new paper, by researchers from the National Institutes of Health, the Food and Drug Administration and Harvard Medical School, was accepted for publication in May of 2010. Social networks and online communities soon learned the general findings and were eagerly awaiting the paper. Read Announcement on NIH Website: NIH: Virus Linked to Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

Encouraging News For CFS Patients

People with a diagnosis of chronic fatigue syndrome are used to hearing scientists, doctors, employers, friends and family members dismiss the condition as psychosomatic or related to stress or trauma, despite evidence that it is often touched off by an acute viral illness. Many were ecstatic at news that the second study was being published.

“We’re really hoping this will blow the lid off,” said Mary Schweitzer, a historian who has written and spoken about having the illness. “Patients are hopeful that now the disease itself might be treated seriously, that they’ll be treated seriously, and that there might be some solution.”

The senior author of the new paper, Dr. Harvey J. Alter, an infectious-disease expert at the National Institutes of Health, said he was well aware of the intense interest in his findings but had been unable to respond publicly.

“I was sympathetic to the desire of people to know, and it was difficult because we didn’t feel we could communicate with the patient community directly until the paper was published,” he said.

Retroviruses, including H.I.V., store their genetic code as RNA, convert it to DNA and integrate themselves into the host cell’s genome to replicate. At least three antiretroviral drugs used against H.I.V. have been shown in laboratory studies to inhibit XMRV, which has also been associated with prostate cancer.

Some chronic fatigue patients are already trying H.I.V. medications prescribed “off label.” One patient, Dr. Jamie Deckoff-Jones, a physician in Santa Fe, N.M., has been keeping a popular blog about her improving health while taking antiretrovirals prescribed by her doctor. “I think the sickest patients have the right to try the drugs,” she commented in an e-mail.

Dr. Alter was quick to note that “it’s not at all proven” that a retrovirus causes chronic fatigue syndrome. Instead, such an infection could result from underlying problems with the immune system.

Moreover, it remains unclear why only two research teams found evidence of retroviruses. One reason could be that different groups used varying testing and detecting methods; federal health officials have organized an effort to standardize the process.

The studies also used different methods of sampling chronic fatigue patients. Many experts and researchers argue that the C.D.C.’s strategy leads to overdiagnosis because it fails to fully distinguish the disease from psychiatric disorders like depression.

Officials with the agency say their methods are sound. William M. Switzer, a microbiologist who was the lead author of the agency’s paper, said of the new research, “These are very intriguing findings that need to be confirmed.”

https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.1006901107